I hope the readers would recollect that ISROfef hinted at the large order difference in Pay (and so Pension) between the PB3 and PB4 bands in the 6CPC recommendations and implementation.
The point was mainly regarding the difference between SE (in PB3) and SF (in PB4) scales. Such large difference doesnot exist between other succeeding scales. Accordingly, suggestions were given to 7CPC to rectify this, by improving on SE scale. Infact, they considered it and attempted to smooth out the large difference, by using a higher Multiplication factor. ie. 2.67 against 2.57 ( Refer 7CPC- PayMatrix).
In 6CPC, SF (PB4) pay was 54 % more than SE (PB3) pay. Therefore, Pensions too !
In 7CPC, this difference is brought down to 50 % !!
The point was mainly regarding the difference between SE (in PB3) and SF (in PB4) scales. Such large difference doesnot exist between other succeeding scales. Accordingly, suggestions were given to 7CPC to rectify this, by improving on SE scale. Infact, they considered it and attempted to smooth out the large difference, by using a higher Multiplication factor. ie. 2.67 against 2.57 ( Refer 7CPC- PayMatrix).
In 6CPC, SF (PB4) pay was 54 % more than SE (PB3) pay. Therefore, Pensions too !
In 7CPC, this difference is brought down to 50 % !!
No comments:
Post a Comment