Now, a minimum of 20 years service is sufficient to get Full Pension (even for Pre-2006 retirees). But it doesnot value longer service you have put in the job; No matter how many years more the employee has put in.
For Post-2006 retirees, that's not an issue. He will be getting a higher pension on account of his longer service (more increments) and/or by way of his promotions to a higher grade.
But NOW, for Pre-2006 retirees there's a glaring injustice. A retiree with 20 years service and another with more than 20 years ( or even 33 or more) will get the same pension. Is there not a case of injustice ? YES !
But , there is a ray of hope in this case. You may not have to go to a Court , seeking justice. The 7CPC recommended OROP for all. That will ensure a higher pension for a higher grade or higher (increments) length of service. The 7CPC - PayMatrix would tell you that. Now let's hope the Govt implements the OROP concept in its real sense.
For Post-2006 retirees, that's not an issue. He will be getting a higher pension on account of his longer service (more increments) and/or by way of his promotions to a higher grade.
But NOW, for Pre-2006 retirees there's a glaring injustice. A retiree with 20 years service and another with more than 20 years ( or even 33 or more) will get the same pension. Is there not a case of injustice ? YES !
But , there is a ray of hope in this case. You may not have to go to a Court , seeking justice. The 7CPC recommended OROP for all. That will ensure a higher pension for a higher grade or higher (increments) length of service. The 7CPC - PayMatrix would tell you that. Now let's hope the Govt implements the OROP concept in its real sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment